- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- M708 vs Deco 640
UGEE M708 vs XP-Pen Deco 640
What M708 does better (2) and where Deco 640 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
M708Deco 640
| M708 | Deco 640 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 210 mm | 150 mm | +60 mm |
| Width | 359 mm | 188.3 mm | +170.7 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M708 better than Deco 640?
- Active area (surface)386 cm² vs 144 cm²2.7×
- Report rate266 RPS vs 220 RPS+21%
Why is Deco 640 better than M708?
- Pressure levels8,192 vs 16,3842×
Specifications
Side by side
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | 8,192 | 16,384 |
| Tilt recognition | ±60° | ±60° |
| Active area | 254 × 152 mm | 160 × 90 mm |
| Active area width | 254 mm | 160 mm |
| Active area height | 152 mm | 90 mm |
| Active area (surface) | 386 cm² | 144 cm² |
| Pen resolution | 5,080 lpi | 5,080 lpi |
| Report rate | 266 RPS | 220 RPS |
| Battery-free pen | Yes | Yes |
| Pen | — | P01(16K) |
| Express keys | 8 | 8 |
| Multi-touch | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless connection | No | No |
| Compatibility | Windows, macOS, Linux, ChromeOS | Windows, macOS, Android |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Weight | — | 0.17 kg |
| Width | 359 mm | 188 mm |
| Height | 210 mm | 150 mm |
| Depth | — | 8 mm |
| Product line | — | XP-Pen Deco |
