- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- U1600 vs Cintiq Pro 22
UGEE U1600 vs Wacom Cintiq Pro 22
What U1600 does better (1) and where Cintiq Pro 22 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.0Screen9.4
3.6Pen & controls8.1
4.6Connectivity5.5
6.8Design & ergonomics4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
U1600Cintiq Pro 22
| U1600 | Cintiq Pro 22 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 263 mm | 312 mm | −49 mm |
| Width | 402 mm | 517 mm | −115 mm |
| Weight | 1.3 kg | 5 kg | −3.7 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is U1600 better than Cintiq Pro 22?
- Weight1.32 kg vs 5 kg3.8×
Why is Cintiq Pro 22 better than U1600?
- Pixel density143 ppi vs 205 ppi+43%
- Multi-touchNo · U1600: Yes
- Active area (surface)655 cm² vs 1,276 cm²+95%
- Screen size15.4″ vs 21.5″+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.4″ | 21.5″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | Full HD | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 143 ppi | 205 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | — | 16:9 |
| Brightness (typical) | 220 nits | — |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | — |
| Response time | — | 12 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | — | Yes |
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | 8,192 | 8,192 |
| Tilt recognition | ±60° | ±60° |
| Active area | 341 × 192 mm | 476 × 268 mm |
| Active area width | 341 mm | 476 mm |
| Active area height | 192 mm | 268 mm |
| Active area (surface) | 655 cm² | 1,276 cm² |
| Pen resolution | 5,080 lpi | — |
| Report rate | — | 240 RPS |
| Pen accuracy (centre) | ±0.5 mm | — |
| Battery-free pen | Yes | Yes |
| Pen with eraser | Yes | — |
| Express keys | — | 8 |
| Multi-touch | No | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | — | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | — | 1 |
| DisplayPort inputs | — | 1 |
| Wireless connection | No | No |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Weight | 1.32 kg | 5 kg |
| Width | 402 mm | 517 mm |
| Height | 263 mm | 312 mm |
| Depth | — | 30 mm |
| Product line | — | Wacom Cintiq Pro |
