- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- U1600 vs DTK-1660E
UGEE U1600 vs Wacom DTK-1660E
What U1600 does better (2) and where DTK-1660E wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
U1600DTK-1660E
| U1600 | DTK-1660E | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 263 mm | 285 mm | −22 mm |
| Width | 402 mm | 422 mm | −20 mm |
| Weight | 1.3 kg | 1.9 kg | −0.6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is U1600 better than DTK-1660E?
- Brightness (typical)220 nits vs 210 nits+5%
- Weight1.32 kg vs 1.9 kg+44%
Why is DTK-1660E better than U1600?
DTK-1660E has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.4″ | 15.5″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 143 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | — | 16:9 |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness (typical) | 220 nits | 210 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | — | 25 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | — | Yes |
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | 8,192 | 8,192 |
| Tilt recognition | ±60° | — |
| Active area | 341 × 192 mm | 344.2 × 193.6 mm |
| Active area width | 341 mm | 344 mm |
| Active area height | 192 mm | 194 mm |
| Active area (surface) | 655 cm² | 666 cm² |
| Pen resolution | 5,080 lpi | — |
| Pen accuracy (centre) | ±0.5 mm | ±0.5 mm |
| Battery-free pen | Yes | — |
| Pen with eraser | Yes | — |
| Multi-touch | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | — | No |
| HDMI inputs | — | 1 |
| Wireless connection | No | No |
| Compatibility | — | Windows, macOS |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Weight | 1.32 kg | 1.9 kg |
| Width | 402 mm | 422 mm |
| Height | 263 mm | 285 mm |
| Depth | — | 24 mm |
