How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. U1600 vs DTK-2451

UGEE U1600 vs Wacom DTK-2451

What U1600 does better (4) and where DTK-2451 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

UGEE U1600
UGEE · 2023U1600
5.8Score
4 advantages
Higher score
vs
Wacom DTK-2451
Wacom · 2022DTK-2451
3.6Score
2 advantages≈ $3,300
3.0Screen2.2
3.6Pen & controls2.1
4.6Connectivity2.1
6.8Design & ergonomics2.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

U1600DTK-2451
402 × 263601 × 296
U1600DTK-2451Difference
Height263 mm296 mm−33 mm
Width402 mm601 mm−199 mm
Weight1.3 kg7.2 kg−5.9 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is U1600 better than DTK-2451?

  1. Pressure levels8,192 vs 2,0484×
  2. Pixel density143 ppi vs 88 ppi+62%
  3. Weight1.32 kg vs 7.2 kg5.5×
  4. Pen resolution5,080 lpi vs 2,540 lpi2×

Why is DTK-2451 better than U1600?

  1. Active area (surface)655 cm² vs 1,876 cm²2.9×
  2. Screen size15.4″ vs 25″+62%
Specifications

Side by side

Wacom DTK-2451Wacom DTK-2451≈ $3,3003.6
Display
Screen size15.4″25″
Resolution1920 × 10801920 × 1080
Resolution classFull HDFull HD
Pixel density143 ppi88 ppi
Aspect ratio—16:9
Brightness (typical)220 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time—16 ms
Pen & controls
Pressure levels8,1922,048
Tilt recognition±60°—
Active area341 × 192 mm527 × 356 mm
Active area width341 mm527 mm
Active area height192 mm356 mm
Active area (surface)655 cm²1,876 cm²
Pen resolution5,080 lpi2,540 lpi
Report rate—187 RPS
Pen accuracy (centre)±0.5 mm±0.5 mm
Battery-free penYes—
Pen with eraserYes—
Express keys—4
Multi-touchNoNo
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)—No
Wireless connectionNoNo
Compatibility—Windows, macOS
Design & ergonomics
Weight1.32 kg7.2 kg
Width402 mm601 mm
Height263 mm296 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare