- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- Deco 640 vs Deco Mini7 V2
XP-Pen Deco 640 vs XP-Pen Deco Mini7 V2
What Deco 640 does better (1) and where Deco Mini7 V2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Pen & controls7.8
4.8Connectivity4.8
9.0Design & ergonomics7.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Deco 640Deco Mini7 V2
| Deco 640 | Deco Mini7 V2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 150 mm | 162.2 mm | −12.2 mm |
| Width | 188.3 mm | 260.2 mm | −71.9 mm |
| Depth | 7.7 mm | 9.3 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Weight | 0.2 kg | 0.3 kg | −0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Deco 640 better than Deco Mini7 V2?
- Weight0.17 kg vs 0.31 kg+81%
Why is Deco Mini7 V2 better than Deco 640?
- Active area (surface)144 cm² vs 197 cm²+37%
Specifications
Side by side
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | 16,384 | 16,384 |
| Tilt recognition | ±60° | ±60° |
| Active area | 160 × 90 mm | 177.8 × 111 mm |
| Active area width | 160 mm | 178 mm |
| Active area height | 90 mm | 111 mm |
| Active area (surface) | 144 cm² | 197 cm² |
| Pen resolution | 5,080 lpi | 5,080 lpi |
| Report rate | 220 RPS | 220 RPS |
| Battery-free pen | Yes | Yes |
| Pen | P01(16K) | Battery-free stylus |
| Express keys | 8 | 8 |
| Multi-touch | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless connection | No | No |
| Compatibility | Windows, macOS, Android | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, ChromeOS |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Weight | 0.17 kg | 0.31 kg |
| Width | 188 mm | 260 mm |
| Height | 150 mm | 162 mm |
| Depth | 8 mm | 9 mm |
| Product line | XP-Pen Deco | XP-Pen Deco |
