How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Displays & pen tablets
  3. Asus ProArt PA27UCDMR
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Asus ProArt PA27UCDMR

10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the ProArt PA27UCDMR — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Alternatives to the ProArt PA27UCDMR

BenQ MA270S
3
BenQ · 2026MA270S
9.2
25% cheaper ≈ $1,100
  • Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 250 nits
  • Pixel density 218 ppi vs 166 ppi
  • HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
  • Refresh rate 70 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,500,000:1
Asus ProArt PA329CDV
4
Asus · 2026ProArt PA329CDV
9.1
18% cheaper ≈ $1,200
  • Swivel
  • Brightness (typical) 300 nits vs 250 nits
  • Screen size 31.5″ vs 26.5″
  • Pixel density 140 ppi vs 166 ppi
  • Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed) ΔE 1.5 vs ΔE 1
BenQ PD2730S
6
BenQ · 2025PD2730S
9.0
19% cheaper ≈ $1,150
  • Pixel density 218 ppi vs 166 ppi
  • Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 250 nits
  • HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
  • Refresh rate 76 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,500,000:1
BenQ MA320UG
8
BenQ · 2026MA320UG
8.7
36% cheaper ≈ $920
  • Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 250 nits
  • HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
  • HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
  • Pixel density 140 ppi vs 166 ppi
  • Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,500,000:1
BenQ PD2732U
9
BenQ · 2026PD2732U
8.6
38% cheaper ≈ $900
  • Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 250 nits
  • Swivel
  • Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 1,500,000:1
LG UltraFine 32U990A
10
8.7
16% pricier ≈ $1,650
  • Pixel density 224 ppi vs 166 ppi
  • Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 250 nits
  • HDR DisplayHDR 600 vs HDR10
  • Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,500,000:1
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare