16% pricier ≈ $1,550
- Refresh rate 76 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Height adjustment 150 mm vs 120 mm
- Screen size 32″ vs 27″
- Pixel density 138 ppi vs 163 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 300 nits
Alternatives to Asus ProArt PA27UCX
10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the ProArt PA27UCX — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the ProArt PA27UCX
14% cheaper ≈ $1,150
- Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 300 nits
- DCI-P3 coverage 99% vs 97%
- Height adjustment 155 mm vs 120 mm
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 60 W vs 90 W
- Response time 10 ms vs 4 ms
22% pricier ≈ $1,600
- Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 300 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 92 W vs 90 W
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,600:1 vs 1,000:1
- Pixel density 109 ppi vs 163 ppi
- Response time 19 ms vs 4 ms
4% pricier ≈ $1,400
- Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 300 nits
- DCI-P3 coverage 99% vs 97%
- Weight 8.6 kg vs 11.5 kg
- Response time 5 ms vs 4 ms
41% cheaper ≈ $790
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,300:1 vs 1,000:1
- Response time 8 ms vs 4 ms
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 300 nits
25% cheaper ≈ $1,000
- Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 300 nits
- Weight 8.3 kg vs 11.5 kg
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,300:1 vs 1,000:1
- Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed) ΔE 2 vs ΔE 1
- Response time 5 ms vs 4 ms
31% pricier ≈ $1,750
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,300:1 vs 1,000:1
- Height adjustment 130 mm vs 120 mm
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 300 nits
- Response time 6 ms vs 4 ms
76% pricier ≈ $2,350
- Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 300 nits
- Contrast ratio (static) 20,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- DCI-P3 coverage 99% vs 97%
- Pixel density 138 ppi vs 163 ppi
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 60 W vs 90 W
22% pricier ≈ $1,600
- Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 300 nits
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 163 ppi
- Weight 6.3 kg vs 11.5 kg
- Height adjustment 105 mm vs 120 mm
11% pricier ≈ $1,500
- Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 300 nits
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 163 ppi
- Response time 5 ms vs 4 ms