Same price ≈ $1,150
- HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
- Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,500:1
- Refresh rate 76 Hz vs 60 Hz
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 96 W
- Screen size 27″ vs 31.5″
Alternatives to Asus ProArt PA32QCV
10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the ProArt PA32QCV — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the ProArt PA32QCV
Same price ≈ $1,150
- Response time 1 ms vs 5 ms
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 60 Hz
- HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 218 ppi
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 96 W
7% cheaper ≈ $1,100
- HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
- HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
- Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 400 nits
- Anti-glare / matte screen
- Screen size 27″ vs 31.5″
7% cheaper ≈ $1,100
- Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed) ΔE 1 vs ΔE 2
- Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 400 nits
- HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 218 ppi
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 1,500:1
44% pricier ≈ $1,650
- Pixel density 224 ppi vs 218 ppi
- HDR DisplayHDR 600 vs HDR10
- Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 400 nits
- Height adjustment 60 mm vs 130 mm
- Weight 9.5 kg vs 9.3 kg
22% cheaper ≈ $900
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 96 W
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Contrast ratio (static) 3,000:1 vs 1,500:1
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 218 ppi
Same price ≈ $1,200
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 1,500:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
- Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed) ΔE 1.5 vs ΔE 2
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 218 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 300 nits vs 400 nits
21% cheaper ≈ $920
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
- HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
- HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 218 ppi
- Anti-glare / matte screen
27% pricier ≈ $1,450
- Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed) ΔE 1 vs ΔE 2
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 1,500:1
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 218 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 400 nits
22% cheaper ≈ $900
- Weight 8.56 kg vs 9.3 kg
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 218 ppi
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 96 W