How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. Studio Display (2026) vs ProArt PA32QCV

Apple Studio Display (2026) vs Asus ProArt PA32QCV

What Studio Display (2026) does better (2) and where ProArt PA32QCV wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Apple Studio Display (2026)
9.6Score
2 advantages≈ $1,600
Higher score
vs
Asus ProArt PA32QCV
Asus · 2025ProArt PA32QCV
8.1Score
1 advantage≈ $1,200
9.5Screen9.2
8.8Connectivity7.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Studio Display (2026)ProArt PA32QCV
623 × 36231714.2 × 617.9240.1
Studio Display (2026)ProArt PA32QCVDifference
Height362 mm617.9 mm−255.9 mm
Width623 mm714.2 mm−91.2 mm
Depth31 mm240.1 mm−209.1 mm
Weight5.4 kg9.3 kg−3.9 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Studio Display (2026) better than ProArt PA32QCV?

  1. Brightness (typical)600 nits vs 400 nits+50%
  2. Weight5.4 kg vs 9.3 kg+72%

Why is ProArt PA32QCV better than Studio Display (2026)?

  1. Screen size27″ vs 31.5″+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Asus ProArt PA32QCVAsus ProArt PA32QCV≈ $1,2008.1
Display
Screen size27″31.5″
Resolution5120 × 28806016 × 3384
Resolution class5K6K
Pixel density218 ppi218 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)600 nits400 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)—600 nits
Contrast ratio (static)—1,500:1
Response time—5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage—100%
DCI-P3 coverage—98%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)—ΔE 2
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
HDR—HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W96 W
ThunderboltYesYes
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs—1
DisplayPort inputs—1
USB hubYesYes
Daisy chain (DP MST)Yes—
Built-in speakersYesYes
Built-in webcamYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—130 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)—Yes
Swivel—Yes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight5.4 kg9.3 kg
Width623 mm714 mm
Height362 mm618 mm
Depth31 mm240 mm
Product line—ASUS ProArt
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare