Apple Studio Display (2026) vs Asus ProArt PA32QCV

What Studio Display (2026) does better (1) and where ProArt PA32QCV wins (1) — every spec side by side.

9.6Score

1 advantage≈ $1,600

Higher score

8.0Score

1 advantage≈ $1,150

9.6Screen9.2

9.1Connectivity7.1

Why is Studio Display (2026) better than ProArt PA32QCV?

Specifications

Only differences	Apple Studio Display (2026)≈ $1,6009.6	Asus ProArt PA32QCV≈ $1,1508.0
Display
Screen size	27″	31.5″
Resolution	5120 × 2880	6016 × 3384
Resolution class	5K	6K
Pixel density	218 ppi	218 ppi
Aspect ratio	16:9	16:9
Panel type	IPS	IPS
Refresh rate	60 Hz	60 Hz
Brightness (typical)	600 nits	400 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)	—	600 nits
Contrast ratio (static)	—	1,500:1
Response time	—	5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screen	Yes	Yes
Colour
sRGB coverage	—	100%
DCI-P3 coverage	—	98%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)	—	ΔE 2
Colour depth	10 bit	10 bit
HDR	—	HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)	Yes	Yes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)	96 W	96 W
Thunderbolt	Yes	Yes
KVM switch	—	Yes
HDMI inputs	—	1
DisplayPort inputs	—	1
USB hub	—	Yes
Daisy chain (DP MST)	Yes	—
Built-in speakers	Yes	Yes
Built-in webcam	Yes	—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment	—	130 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)	—	Yes
Swivel	—	Yes
VESA mount	100 × 100 mm	100 × 100 mm
Weight	—	9.3 kg
Width	—	714 mm
Height	—	618 mm
Depth	—	240 mm
Product line	—	ASUS ProArt