How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. Studio Display (2026) vs ProArt PA329CDV

Apple Studio Display (2026) vs Asus ProArt PA329CDV

What Studio Display (2026) does better (2) and where ProArt PA329CDV wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Apple Studio Display (2026)
9.6Score
2 advantages≈ $1,600
Higher score
vs
Asus ProArt PA329CDV
Asus · 2026ProArt PA329CDV
9.1Score
3 advantages≈ $1,200
9.6Screen8.6
9.1Connectivity7.3

Why is Studio Display (2026) better than ProArt PA329CDV?

  1. Pixel density218 ppi vs 140 ppi+56%
  2. Brightness (typical)600 nits vs 300 nits2×

Why is ProArt PA329CDV better than Studio Display (2026)?

  1. Panel typeIPS vs OLED
  2. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
  3. Screen size27″ vs 31.5″+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size27″31.5″
Resolution5120 × 28803840 × 2160
Resolution class5K4K UHD
Pixel density218 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSOLED
Refresh rate60 Hz120 Hz
Brightness (typical)600 nits300 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)—1,000 nits
Contrast ratio (static)—1,500,000:1
Response time—0.1 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage—100%
DCI-P3 coverage—99%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)—ΔE 1.5
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
HDR—HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W96 W
ThunderboltYes—
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs—1
DisplayPort inputs—1
USB hub—Yes
Daisy chain (DP MST)Yes—
Built-in speakersYesYes
Built-in webcamYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—130 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)—Yes
Swivel—Yes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight—7.05 kg
Width—720 mm
Height—607 mm
Depth—222 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare