- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- Studio Display (2026) vs MA270S
Apple Studio Display (2026) vs BenQ MA270S
What Studio Display (2026) does better (2) and where MA270S wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Screen9.0
9.1Connectivity8.8
Why is Studio Display (2026) better than MA270S?
- Brightness (typical)600 nits vs 450 nits+33%
- Anti-glare / matte screenYes · MA270S: No
Why is MA270S better than Studio Display (2026)?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 70 Hz+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 27″ | 27″ |
| Resolution | 5120 × 2880 | 5120 × 2880 |
| Resolution class | 5K | 5K |
| Pixel density | 218 ppi | 218 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 70 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 600 nits | 450 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | — | 2,000:1 |
| Response time | — | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | No |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | — | 99% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 99% |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | — |
| HDR | — | DisplayHDR 400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 96 W | 96 W |
| Thunderbolt | Yes | Yes |
| KVM switch | — | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | — | 2 |
| USB hub | — | Yes |
| Daisy chain (DP MST) | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in webcam | Yes | — |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | — | 150 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | — | Yes |
| Swivel | — | Yes |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | — | 8.64 kg |
| Width | — | 614 mm |
| Height | — | 580 mm |
| Depth | — | 220 mm |
| Product line | — | BenQ MA |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ProArt PA32UCDMRvsApple Studio Display (2026)
9.39.6
vs
Asus ProArt PA27UCDMRvsApple Studio Display (2026)
8.99.6
vs
Asus ProArt PA27USDvsApple Studio Display (2026)
9.59.6
vs
Asus ProArt PA279CDVvsApple Studio Display (2026)
9.49.6
vs
Asus ProArt PA329CDVvsApple Studio Display (2026)
9.19.6
vs
Dell UltraSharp U3226QvsApple Studio Display (2026)
8.99.6