How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA32UCDMR vs MA270S

Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR vs BenQ MA270S

What ProArt PA32UCDMR does better (7) and where MA270S wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR
Asus · 2026ProArt PA32UCDMR
9.3Score
7 advantages≈ $1,550
Higher score
vs
BenQ MA270S
BenQ · 2026MA270S
9.2Score
2 advantages≈ $1,100
9.7Screen9.0
9.2Connectivity8.8
2.6Design & ergonomics7.0

Why is ProArt PA32UCDMR better than MA270S?

  1. Refresh rate240 Hz vs 70 Hz3.4×
  2. Contrast ratio (static)1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1750×
  3. Response time0.1 ms vs 5 ms50×
  4. Panel typeOLED vs IPS
  5. Anti-glare / matte screenYes · MA270S: No
  6. HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400 vs DisplayHDR 400
  7. Screen size31.5″ vs 27″+17%

Why is MA270S better than ProArt PA32UCDMR?

  1. Pixel density140 ppi vs 218 ppi+56%
  2. SwivelNo · ProArt PA32UCDMR: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ MA270SBenQ MA270S≈ $1,1009.2
Display
Screen size31.5″27″
Resolution3840 × 21605120 × 2880
Resolution class4K UHD5K
Pixel density140 ppi218 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeOLEDIPS
Refresh rate240 Hz70 Hz
Brightness (typical)—450 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,500,000:12,000:1
Response time0.1 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesNo
Colour
sRGB coverage100%99%
DCI-P3 coverage99%99%
Rec. 2020 coverage99%—
Colour depth10 bit—
HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400DisplayHDR 400
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W96 W
ThunderboltYesYes
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs1—
USB hubYesYes
Daisy chain (DP MST)—Yes
Built-in speakers—Yes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—150 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelNoYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight—8.64 kg
Width—614 mm
Height—580 mm
Depth—220 mm
Product lineASUS ProArtBenQ MA
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare