How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA32UCDMR vs UltraSharp U3226Q

Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR vs Dell UltraSharp U3226Q

What ProArt PA32UCDMR does better (2) and where UltraSharp U3226Q wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR
Asus · 2026ProArt PA32UCDMR
9.3Score
2 advantages≈ $1,550
Higher score
vs
Dell UltraSharp U3226Q
Dell · 2026UltraSharp U3226Q
8.9Score
4 advantages≈ $2,450
9.7Screen8.7
9.6Colour accuracy5.7
9.2Connectivity9.3
2.6Design & ergonomics6.1

Why is ProArt PA32UCDMR better than UltraSharp U3226Q?

  1. Refresh rate240 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
  2. Rec. 2020 coverage99% vs 80%+24%

Why is UltraSharp U3226Q better than ProArt PA32UCDMR?

  1. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W vs 140 W+46%
  2. Response time0.1 ms vs 0.03 ms3.3×
  3. HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400 vs DisplayHDR True Black 500
  4. SwivelNo · ProArt PA32UCDMR: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size31.5″31.5″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density140 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeOLEDOLED
Refresh rate240 Hz120 Hz
Brightness (typical)—300 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,500,000:11,500,000:1
Response time0.1 ms0.03 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%100%
Adobe RGB coverage—94%
DCI-P3 coverage99%99%
Rec. 2020 coverage99%80%
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400DisplayHDR True Black 500
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W140 W
ThunderboltYesYes
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakers—No
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—150 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelNoYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight—9.84 kg
Width—718 mm
Height—624 mm
Depth—217 mm
Product lineASUS ProArt—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare