How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. Studio Display (2026) vs ProArt PA32UCDMR

Apple Studio Display (2026) vs Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR

What Studio Display (2026) does better (1) and where ProArt PA32UCDMR wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Apple Studio Display (2026)
9.6Score
1 advantage≈ $1,600
Higher score
vs
Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR
Asus · 2026ProArt PA32UCDMR
9.3Score
3 advantages≈ $1,550
9.6Screen9.7
9.1Connectivity9.2

Why is Studio Display (2026) better than ProArt PA32UCDMR?

  1. Pixel density218 ppi vs 140 ppi+56%

Why is ProArt PA32UCDMR better than Studio Display (2026)?

  1. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 240 Hz4×
  2. Panel typeIPS vs OLED
  3. Screen size27″ vs 31.5″+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size27″31.5″
Resolution5120 × 28803840 × 2160
Resolution class5K4K UHD
Pixel density218 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSOLED
Refresh rate60 Hz240 Hz
Brightness (typical)600 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)—1,500,000:1
Response time—0.1 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage—100%
DCI-P3 coverage—99%
Rec. 2020 coverage—99%
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
HDR—DisplayHDR True Black 400
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W96 W
ThunderboltYesYes
HDMI inputs—2
DisplayPort inputs—1
USB hub—Yes
Daisy chain (DP MST)Yes—
Built-in speakersYes—
Built-in webcamYes—
Design & ergonomics
Pivot (portrait rotation)—Yes
Swivel—No
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Product line—ASUS ProArt
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare