How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA32UCDMR vs UltraFine 32U990A

Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR vs LG UltraFine 32U990A

What ProArt PA32UCDMR does better (5) and where UltraFine 32U990A wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR
Asus · 2026ProArt PA32UCDMR
9.3Score
5 advantages≈ $1,550
Higher score
vs
LG UltraFine 32U990A
8.7Score
2 advantages≈ $1,650
9.7Screen9.6
9.6Colour accuracy9.3
9.2Connectivity7.1
2.6Design & ergonomics2.4

Why is ProArt PA32UCDMR better than UltraFine 32U990A?

  1. Refresh rate240 Hz vs 60 Hz4×
  2. Contrast ratio (static)1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1750×
  3. Response time0.1 ms vs 5 ms50×
  4. Panel typeOLED vs IPS
  5. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×

Why is UltraFine 32U990A better than ProArt PA32UCDMR?

  1. Pixel density140 ppi vs 224 ppi+60%
  2. HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400 vs DisplayHDR 600
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size31.5″31.5″
Resolution3840 × 21606144 × 3456
Resolution class4K UHD6K
Pixel density140 ppi224 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeOLEDIPS
Refresh rate240 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)—450 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,500,000:12,000:1
Response time0.1 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%—
Adobe RGB coverage—99.5%
DCI-P3 coverage99%98%
Rec. 2020 coverage99%—
Colour depth10 bit—
HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400DisplayHDR 600
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W96 W
ThunderboltYesYes
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs21
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakers—Yes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—60 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelNo—
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight—9.5 kg
Width—718 mm
Height—582 mm
Depth—198 mm
Product lineASUS ProArt—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare