Same price ≈ $1,500
- Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 250 nits
- HDR DisplayHDR 600 vs HDR10
- HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
- Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,500,000:1
- Response time 5 ms vs 0.1 ms
Alternatives to Asus ProArt PA32UCDM
10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the ProArt PA32UCDM — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the ProArt PA32UCDM
21% pricier ≈ $1,750
- Pixel density 224 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 250 nits
- HDR DisplayHDR 600 vs HDR10
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 240 Hz
- Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,500,000:1
20% cheaper ≈ $1,150
- Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 250 nits
- HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
- Swivel
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,200:1 vs 1,500,000:1
- Response time 1 ms vs 0.1 ms
19% cheaper ≈ $1,150
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 250 nits
- HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
- Refresh rate 76 Hz vs 240 Hz
- Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,500,000:1
Same price ≈ $1,450
- Pixel density 166 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Weight 7.2 kg vs 9 kg
- Screen size 26.5″ vs 31.5″
17% cheaper ≈ $1,200
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 250 nits
- Swivel
- Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed) ΔE 2 vs ΔE 1
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 240 Hz
14% pricier ≈ $1,650
- HDR DisplayHDR True Black 400 vs HDR10
- HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
9% pricier ≈ $1,600
- Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 250 nits
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Weight 5.4 kg vs 9 kg
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 240 Hz
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
18% cheaper ≈ $1,200
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 250 nits
- HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
- Refresh rate 70 Hz vs 240 Hz
- Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,500,000:1
28% cheaper ≈ $1,050
- Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 250 nits
- HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
- Swivel
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 240 Hz
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 1,500,000:1