How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. Studio Display (2026) vs ProArt PA32UCDM

Apple Studio Display (2026) vs Asus ProArt PA32UCDM

What Studio Display (2026) does better (2) and where ProArt PA32UCDM wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Apple Studio Display (2026)
9.6Score
2 advantages≈ $1,600
Higher score
vs
Asus ProArt PA32UCDM
Asus · 2025ProArt PA32UCDM
8.1Score
3 advantages≈ $1,450
9.6Screen8.4
9.1Connectivity7.7

Why is Studio Display (2026) better than ProArt PA32UCDM?

  1. Brightness (typical)600 nits vs 250 nits2.4×
  2. Pixel density218 ppi vs 140 ppi+56%

Why is ProArt PA32UCDM better than Studio Display (2026)?

  1. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 240 Hz4×
  2. Panel typeIPS vs OLED
  3. Screen size27″ vs 31.5″+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size27″31.5″
Resolution5120 × 28803840 × 2160
Resolution class5K4K UHD
Pixel density218 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSOLED
Refresh rate60 Hz240 Hz
Brightness (typical)600 nits250 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)—1,000 nits
Contrast ratio (static)—1,500,000:1
Response time—0.1 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage—100%
DCI-P3 coverage—99%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)—ΔE 1
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
Hardware calibration—Yes
HDR—HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W96 W
ThunderboltYesYes
HDMI inputs—1
USB hub—Yes
Daisy chain (DP MST)YesYes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Built-in webcamYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—130 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)—Yes
Swivel—No
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight—9 kg
Width—717 mm
Height—602 mm
Depth—228 mm
Product line—ASUS ProArt
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare