8% pricier ≈ $1,150
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
- Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 600 nits
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
Alternatives to Asus ProArt PA32UCE
10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the ProArt PA32UCE — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the ProArt PA32UCE
8% pricier ≈ $1,150
- Response time 1 ms vs 5 ms
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 60 Hz
- HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
- Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 600 nits
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
Same price ≈ $1,100
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
- Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 600 nits
- Anti-glare / matte screen
7% pricier ≈ $1,150
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500:1 vs 1,000:1
- Height adjustment 130 mm vs 120 mm
- Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed) ΔE 2 vs ΔE 1
- Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 600 nits
17% cheaper ≈ $900
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 96 W
- Contrast ratio (static) 3,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 600 nits
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
15% cheaper ≈ $920
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
- Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 600 nits
- Anti-glare / matte screen
17% cheaper ≈ $900
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Weight 8.56 kg vs 8.9 kg
- Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 600 nits
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
Same price ≈ $1,100
- Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
- Height adjustment 150 mm vs 120 mm
- Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 600 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 85 W vs 96 W
9% pricier ≈ $1,200
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Brightness (typical) 300 nits vs 600 nits
- Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed) ΔE 1.5 vs ΔE 1
19% cheaper ≈ $870
- Height adjustment 140 mm vs 120 mm
- Weight 8.3 kg vs 8.9 kg
- Brightness (typical) 300 nits vs 600 nits
- Pixel density 109 ppi vs 140 ppi