6% pricier ≈ $2,500
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 138 ppi
- Panel type Mini-LED (IPS) vs IPS
- HDR DisplayHDR 1000 vs HDR10
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,100:1 vs 20,000:1
- Rec. 2020 coverage 73% vs 89%
Alternatives to Asus ProArt PA32UCX
10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the ProArt PA32UCX — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the ProArt PA32UCX
4% pricier ≈ $2,450
- Pixel density 164 ppi vs 138 ppi
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 94 W vs 60 W
- Weight 9.7 kg vs 14 kg
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,450:1 vs 20,000:1
- Response time 13 ms vs 5 ms
29% pricier ≈ $3,000
- Brightness (typical) 1,000 nits vs 600 nits
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Peak brightness (HDR) 1,600 nits vs 1,200 nits
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 20,000:1
- Rec. 2020 coverage 85% vs 89%
71% pricier ≈ $4,000
- Brightness (typical) 1,000 nits vs 600 nits
- Panel type Mini-LED (IPS) vs IPS
- HDR DisplayHDR 1000 vs HDR10
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,300:1 vs 20,000:1
- Adobe RGB coverage 93% vs 99.5%
10% cheaper ≈ $2,100
- Pixel density 164 ppi vs 138 ppi
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000,000:1 vs 20,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
- Brightness (typical) 200 nits vs 600 nits
- Peak brightness (HDR) 350 nits vs 1,200 nits
46% pricier ≈ $3,400
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000,000:1 vs 20,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 600 nits
- Peak brightness (HDR) 500 nits vs 1,200 nits
26% cheaper ≈ $1,750
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 138 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 600 nits
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,300:1 vs 20,000:1
28% cheaper ≈ $1,700
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 60 W
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
- HDR DisplayHDR 600 vs HDR10
- Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 20,000:1
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 3
7% pricier ≈ $2,500
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 60 W
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 20,000:1
- Response time 0.03 ms vs 5 ms
- Brightness (typical) 300 nits vs 600 nits
- Adobe RGB coverage 94% vs 99.5%
31% cheaper ≈ $1,600
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 92 W vs 60 W
- Weight 9.4 kg vs 14 kg
- Height adjustment 155 mm vs 130 mm
- Pixel density 109 ppi vs 138 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 600 nits