How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA32UCX vs ThinkVision Creator Extreme

Asus ProArt PA32UCX vs Lenovo ThinkVision Creator Extreme

What ProArt PA32UCX does better (4) and where ThinkVision Creator Extreme wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA32UCX
Asus · 2020ProArt PA32UCX
7.8Score
4 advantages≈ $2,350
vs
Lenovo ThinkVision Creator Extreme
9.4Score
3 advantages≈ $2,500
Higher score
8.0Screen7.3
9.0Colour accuracy9.1
4.0Connectivity9.1

Why is ProArt PA32UCX better than ThinkVision Creator Extreme?

  1. Contrast ratio (static)20,000:1 vs 1,100:118.2×
  2. Rec. 2020 coverage89% vs 73%+22%
  3. Response time5 ms vs 6 ms+20%
  4. Screen size32″ vs 27″+19%

Why is ThinkVision Creator Extreme better than ProArt PA32UCX?

  1. Pixel density138 ppi vs 163 ppi+18%
  2. Panel typeIPS vs Mini-LED (IPS)
  3. HDRHDR10 vs DisplayHDR 1000
Specifications

Side by side

Asus ProArt PA32UCXAsus ProArt PA32UCX≈ $2,3507.8
Display
Screen size32″27″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density138 ppi163 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSMini-LED (IPS)
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)600 nits—
Peak brightness (HDR)1,200 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)20,000:11,100:1
Response time5 ms6 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYes—
Colour
sRGB coverage100%100%
Adobe RGB coverage99.5%—
DCI-P3 coverage99%99.5%
Rec. 2020 coverage89%73%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 1—
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
Hardware calibrationYes—
HDRHDR10DisplayHDR 1000
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)Yes—
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)60 W—
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs33
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment130 mm—
Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes—
SwivelYes—
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight14 kg—
Width727 mm—
Height600 mm—
Depth240 mm—
Product lineASUS ProArtLenovo ThinkVision
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare