11% pricier ≈ $900
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 400 nits
Alternatives to BenQ PD2732U
10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the PD2732U — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the PD2732U
14% pricier ≈ $920
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 163 ppi
- Anti-glare / matte screen
Same price ≈ $790
- HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
- Height adjustment 140 mm vs 115 mm
- Weight 8.3 kg vs 8.56 kg
- Pixel density 109 ppi vs 163 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 300 nits vs 400 nits
31% pricier ≈ $1,050
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 163 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 300 nits vs 400 nits
5% cheaper ≈ $770
- Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 400 nits
- Refresh rate 160 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Response time 1 ms vs 5 ms
22% cheaper ≈ $630
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 90 W
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500:1 vs 1,000:1
- Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 400 nits
4% pricier ≈ $840
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 163 ppi
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 90 W
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500:1 vs 1,000:1
- Adobe RGB coverage 95% vs 100%
15% cheaper ≈ $690
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 90 W
- Contrast ratio (static) 3,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
15% pricier ≈ $930
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 90 W
- Contrast ratio (static) 3,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 163 ppi
- Weight 9.34 kg vs 8.56 kg
47% pricier ≈ $1,200
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 163 ppi
- Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
- Anti-glare / matte screen