14% cheaper ≈ $370
- DisplayPort inputs 2 vs 1
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 90 W
- Weight 5.6 kg vs 7.8 kg
- Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 400 nits
- DCI-P3 coverage 95% vs 98%
Alternatives to BenQ SW242Q
10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the SW242Q — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the SW242Q
9% cheaper ≈ $390
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 125 ppi
- Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
21% cheaper ≈ $340
- DisplayPort inputs 2 vs 1
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 90 W
- Refresh rate 100 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Pixel density 109 ppi vs 125 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 400 nits
5% pricier ≈ $450
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 90 W
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500:1 vs 1,000:1
- Pixel density 109 ppi vs 125 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 400 nits
5% pricier ≈ $450
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- Screen size 27″ vs 24.1″
- Pixel density 109 ppi vs 125 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 400 nits
49% pricier ≈ $640
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 125 ppi
- Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
28% pricier ≈ $550
- Pixel density 184 ppi vs 125 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 500 nits vs 400 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 100 W vs 90 W
14% pricier ≈ $490
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 125 ppi
- HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 90 W
- Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 400 nits
40% pricier ≈ $600
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 125 ppi
- HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
- HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
- DCI-P3 coverage 95% vs 98%
- Weight 8.2 kg vs 7.8 kg
7% cheaper ≈ $400
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 125 ppi
- HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
- Screen size 31.5″ vs 24.1″
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 60 W vs 90 W
- Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 400 nits