8% cheaper ≈ $1,200
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 94 ppi
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 70 W
- Response time 5 ms vs 11 ms
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500:1 vs 1,800:1
- Height adjustment 130 mm vs 155 mm
Alternatives to EIZO ColorEdge CG2400S
10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the ColorEdge CG2400S — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the ColorEdge CG2400S
12% pricier ≈ $1,450
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 94 ppi
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 61 Hz
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 1,800:1
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 400 nits
- Swivel
10% cheaper ≈ $1,150
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 94 ppi
- Response time 5 ms vs 11 ms
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 70 W
- Height adjustment 150 mm vs 155 mm
11% cheaper ≈ $1,150
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 94 ppi
- Response time 1 ms vs 11 ms
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 61 Hz
- DCI-P3 coverage 95% vs 98%
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,200:1 vs 1,800:1
20% cheaper ≈ $1,050
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 94 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 400 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 70 W
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 1,800:1
- Height adjustment 120 mm vs 155 mm
14% pricier ≈ $1,500
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 94 ppi
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 70 W
- Response time 5 ms vs 11 ms
- Weight 14.1 kg vs 8.5 kg
- Height adjustment 130 mm vs 155 mm
8% cheaper ≈ $1,200
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 94 ppi
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 70 W
- Response time 5 ms vs 11 ms
- Anti-glare / matte screen
- Height adjustment 150 mm vs 155 mm
11% pricier ≈ $1,450
- Pixel density 166 ppi vs 94 ppi
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 61 Hz
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 1,800:1
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 400 nits
- Swivel
35% pricier ≈ $1,750
- Pixel density 224 ppi vs 94 ppi
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 70 W
- Response time 5 ms vs 11 ms
- Height adjustment 60 mm vs 155 mm
- Weight 9.5 kg vs 8.5 kg
6% pricier ≈ $1,400
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 94 ppi
- Response time 5 ms vs 11 ms
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 70 W
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 1,800:1
- Height adjustment 140 mm vs 155 mm