14% cheaper ≈ $2,100
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000,000:1 vs 1,450:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 13 ms
- HDMI inputs 3 vs 1
- Brightness (typical) 200 nits vs 500 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 80 W vs 94 W
Alternatives to EIZO ColorEdge CG2700X
10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the ColorEdge CG2700X — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the ColorEdge CG2700X
Same price ≈ $2,450
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 94 W
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 1,450:1
- Response time 0.03 ms vs 13 ms
- Brightness (typical) 300 nits vs 500 nits
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 164 ppi
29% cheaper ≈ $1,750
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 164 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 500 nits
- Weight 6.3 kg vs 9.7 kg
24% pricier ≈ $3,000
- HDMI inputs 3 vs 1
- Response time 6 ms vs 13 ms
- Panel type Mini-LED (IPS) vs IPS
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,100:1 vs 1,450:1
9% cheaper ≈ $2,200
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 61 Hz
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 1,450:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 13 ms
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 500 nits
- Height adjustment 130 mm vs 155 mm
56% pricier ≈ $3,800
- Pixel density 223 ppi vs 164 ppi
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 94 W
- HDR DisplayHDR 600 vs HDR10
- Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 500 nits
- Weight 13.3 kg vs 9.7 kg
31% cheaper ≈ $1,650
- Pixel density 224 ppi vs 164 ppi
- Response time 5 ms vs 13 ms
- HDR DisplayHDR 600 vs HDR10
- Height adjustment 60 mm vs 155 mm
- Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 500 nits
27% cheaper ≈ $1,800
- Pixel density 187 ppi vs 164 ppi
- Response time 5 ms vs 13 ms
- HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
- Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 500 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 80 W vs 94 W
35% cheaper ≈ $1,600
- Response time 6 ms vs 13 ms
- HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 500 nits
- Height adjustment 130 mm vs 155 mm
31% cheaper ≈ $1,700
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 94 W
- Response time 5 ms vs 13 ms
- HDR DisplayHDR 600 vs HDR10
- Pixel density 139 ppi vs 164 ppi
- Pivot (portrait rotation)