- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- UltraSharp U3226Q vs ColorEdge CG2700X
Dell UltraSharp U3226Q vs EIZO ColorEdge CG2700X
What UltraSharp U3226Q does better (8) and where ColorEdge CG2700X wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.7Screen8.3
5.7Colour accuracy6.4
9.3Connectivity5.4
6.1Design & ergonomics7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
UltraSharp U3226QColorEdge CG2700X
| UltraSharp U3226Q | ColorEdge CG2700X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 624 mm | 415.9 mm | +208.1 mm |
| Width | 718 mm | 638 mm | +80 mm |
| Depth | 217 mm | 245 mm | −28 mm |
| Weight | 9.8 kg | 9.7 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is UltraSharp U3226Q better than ColorEdge CG2700X?
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery)140 W vs 94 W+49%
- Contrast ratio (static)1,500,000:1 vs 1,450:11,034.5×
- Response time0.03 ms vs 13 ms433.3×
- Panel typeOLED vs IPS
- HDRDisplayHDR True Black 500 vs HDR10
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 61 Hz+97%
- Screen size31.5″ vs 26.9″+17%
Why is ColorEdge CG2700X better than UltraSharp U3226Q?
- Brightness (typical)300 nits vs 500 nits+67%
- Pixel density140 ppi vs 164 ppi+17%
- Adobe RGB coverage94% vs 99%+5%
- Height adjustment150 mm vs 155 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 31.5″ | 26.9″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 140 ppi | 164 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 61 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 300 nits | 500 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,500,000:1 | 1,450:1 |
| Response time | 0.03 ms | 13 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Adobe RGB coverage | 94% | 99% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 99% | 98% |
| Rec. 2020 coverage | 80% | — |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | 10 bit |
| Hardware calibration | — | Yes |
| Built-in calibration sensor | — | Yes |
| HDR | DisplayHDR True Black 500 | HDR10 |
| Uniformity compensation | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 140 W | 94 W |
| Thunderbolt | Yes | — |
| KVM switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (RJ45) | — | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | No | — |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 150 mm | 155 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | Yes |
| Swivel | Yes | Yes |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 9.84 kg | 9.7 kg |
| Width | 718 mm | 638 mm |
| Height | 624 mm | 416 mm |
| Depth | 217 mm | 245 mm |
| Product line | — | EIZO ColorEdge |
Related comparisons
vs
Dell UltraSharp U3226QvsApple Studio Display (2026)
8.99.6
vs
Dell UltraSharp U3226QvsAsus ProArt PA32UCDMR
8.99.3
vs
Dell UltraSharp U3226QvsApple Studio Display XDR
8.99.7
vs
Asus ProArt PA27USDvsDell UltraSharp U3226Q
9.58.9
vs
Asus ProArt PA32USDvsDell UltraSharp U3226Q
9.08.9
vs
EIZO ColorEdge CG2700XvsAsus ProArt PA27DCE
8.47.7