1
Xencelabs · 2023Pen Display 24
29% cheaper ≈ $1,200
- Active area (surface) 1,563 cm² vs 688 cm²
- Screen size 23.8″ vs 15.8″
- Weight 6 kg vs 1.7 kg
Alternatives to Huion Kamvas Studio 16
10 pen displays at a similar price that compete with the Kamvas Studio 16 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Kamvas Studio 16
31% pricier ≈ $2,250
- Pixel density 255 ppi vs 186 ppi
- Response time 8 ms vs 14 ms
- Active area (surface) 821 cm² vs 688 cm²
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Wireless connection
53% cheaper ≈ $810
- Pixel density 284 ppi vs 186 ppi
- Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
- Contrast ratio (static) 100,000:1 vs 1,200:1
- Wireless connection
- Report rate 220 RPS vs 300 RPS
57% pricier ≈ $2,700
- Pixel density 205 ppi vs 186 ppi
- Active area (surface) 1,276 cm² vs 688 cm²
- Screen size 21.5″ vs 15.8″
- Wireless connection
- Weight 5 kg vs 1.7 kg
- Active area (surface) 1,562 cm² vs 688 cm²
- Screen size 23.8″ vs 15.8″
- Wireless connection
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 400 nits
51% cheaper ≈ $840
- Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
- Pixel density 238 ppi vs 186 ppi
- Colour depth 10 bit vs 8 bit
- Wireless connection
- Brightness (typical) 220 nits vs 400 nits
24% cheaper ≈ $1,300
- Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
- Active area (surface) 1,556 cm² vs 688 cm²
- Colour depth 10 bit vs 8 bit
- Wireless connection
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 400 nits
30% cheaper ≈ $1,200
- Active area (surface) 1,560 cm² vs 688 cm²
- Screen size 23.8″ vs 15.8″
- Response time 12 ms vs 14 ms
- Pixel density 123 ppi vs 186 ppi
- Wireless connection
5% pricier ≈ $1,800
- Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
- Response time 5 ms vs 14 ms
- Active area (surface) 2,003 cm² vs 688 cm²
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Wireless connection
9% cheaper ≈ $1,550
- Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
- Active area (surface) 2,003 cm² vs 688 cm²
- Colour depth 10 bit vs 8 bit
- Wireless connection
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 186 ppi