How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Displays & pen tablets
  3. ViewSonic VP2786-4K
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to ViewSonic VP2786-4K

10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the VP2786-4K — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

ViewSonic VP2786-4K
ViewSonic · 2022
VP2786-4K
27″3840 × 2160100%90 W
approx. price≈ $1,000
8.0

Alternatives to the VP2786-4K

BenQ PD3225U
1
BenQ · 2024PD3225U
8.3
9% pricier ≈ $1,100
  • Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 350 nits
  • Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,300:1
  • Screen size 31.5″ vs 27″
  • Pixel density 140 ppi vs 163 ppi
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 85 W vs 90 W
Asus ProArt PA32UCE
2
Asus · 2025ProArt PA32UCE
7.9
8% pricier ≈ $1,100
  • Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed) ΔE 1 vs ΔE 2
  • Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 350 nits
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 90 W
  • Pixel density 140 ppi vs 163 ppi
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 1,300:1
BenQ SW272U
3
BenQ · 2024SW272U
8.3
35% pricier ≈ $1,350
  • Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 350 nits
  • Height adjustment 140 mm vs 130 mm
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 1,300:1
  • Weight 8.6 kg vs 8.3 kg
BenQ PD2730S
4
BenQ · 2025PD2730S
9.0
17% pricier ≈ $1,150
  • Pixel density 218 ppi vs 163 ppi
  • Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 350 nits
  • Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,300:1
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
BenQ PD2732U
5
BenQ · 2026PD2732U
8.6
10% cheaper ≈ $900
  • Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 350 nits
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 1,300:1
Asus ProArt PA32QCV
6
Asus · 2025ProArt PA32QCV
8.0
16% pricier ≈ $1,150
  • Pixel density 218 ppi vs 163 ppi
  • Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 350 nits
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 90 W
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
  • Weight 9.3 kg vs 8.3 kg
Dell UltraSharp U3225QE
7
Dell · 2025UltraSharp U3225QE
9.4
10% cheaper ≈ $900
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 90 W
  • Contrast ratio (static) 3,000:1 vs 1,300:1
  • Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 350 nits
  • Pixel density 140 ppi vs 163 ppi
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
BenQ MA270S
8
BenQ · 2026MA270S
9.2
8% pricier ≈ $1,100
  • Pixel density 218 ppi vs 163 ppi
  • Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 350 nits
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 90 W
  • Anti-glare / matte screen
  • Weight 8.64 kg vs 8.3 kg
Asus ProArt PA279CDV
9
Asus · 2026ProArt PA279CDV
9.4
Same price ≈ $1,000
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 1,300:1
  • Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
  • Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed) ΔE 1.5 vs ΔE 2
  • Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 350 nits
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
Asus ProArt PA27JCV
10
Asus · 2025ProArt PA27JCV
8.6
21% cheaper ≈ $790
  • Pixel density 218 ppi vs 163 ppi
  • Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 350 nits
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 90 W
  • Adobe RGB coverage 95% vs 100%
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare