How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. SW272U vs VP2786-4K

BenQ SW272U vs ViewSonic VP2786-4K

What SW272U does better (2) and where VP2786-4K wins (2) — every spec side by side.

BenQ SW272U
BenQ · 2024SW272U
8.3Score
2 advantages≈ $1,350
Higher score
vs
ViewSonic VP2786-4K
ViewSonic · 2022VP2786-4K
8.0Score
2 advantages≈ $1,000
7.1Screen7.4
7.1Colour accuracy7.2
6.2Connectivity6.5
6.3Design & ergonomics5.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

SW272UVP2786-4K
614 × 592274613 × 449.1232
SW272UVP2786-4KDifference
Height592 mm449.1 mm+142.9 mm
Width614 mm613 mm+1 mm
Depth274 mm232 mm+42 mm
Weight8.6 kg8.3 kg+0.3 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is SW272U better than VP2786-4K?

  1. Brightness (typical)400 nits vs 350 nits+14%
  2. Height adjustment140 mm vs 130 mm+8%

Why is VP2786-4K better than SW272U?

  1. Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1 vs 1,300:1+30%
  2. Weight8.6 kg vs 8.3 kg+4%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ SW272UBenQ SW272U≈ $1,3508.3
ViewSonic VP2786-4KViewSonic VP2786-4K≈ $1,0008.0
Display
Screen size27″27″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density163 ppi163 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz—
Brightness (typical)400 nits350 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,300:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%—
Adobe RGB coverage99%100%
DCI-P3 coverage99%98%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)—ΔE 2
Colour depth—10 bit
Hardware calibration—Yes
Factory calibrated (report)—Yes
HDRHDR10—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W90 W
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYes—
Built-in speakers—Yes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment140 mm130 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes—
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight8.6 kg8.3 kg
Width614 mm613 mm
Height592 mm449 mm
Depth274 mm232 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare