- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- PD3225U vs SW272U
BenQ PD3225U vs BenQ SW272U
What PD3225U does better (5) and where SW272U wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD3225USW272U
| PD3225U | SW272U | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 628 mm | 592 mm | +36 mm |
| Width | 715 mm | 614 mm | +101 mm |
| Depth | 273 mm | 274 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 8.2 kg | 8.6 kg | −0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD3225U better than SW272U?
- Contrast ratio (static)2,000:1 vs 1,000:12×
- HDRDisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
- Screen size31.5″ vs 27″+17%
- Height adjustment150 mm vs 140 mm+7%
- Weight8.2 kg vs 8.6 kg+5%
Why is SW272U better than PD3225U?
- Pixel density140 ppi vs 163 ppi+16%
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery)85 W vs 90 W+6%
- sRGB coverage98% vs 100%+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 31.5″ | 27″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 140 ppi | 163 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 400 nits | 400 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 2,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 98% | 100% |
| Adobe RGB coverage | — | 99% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 98% | 99% |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 | HDR10 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 85 W | 90 W |
| Thunderbolt | Yes | — |
| KVM switch | Yes | — |
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | — |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 150 mm | 140 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | Yes |
| Swivel | Yes | Yes |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 8.2 kg | 8.6 kg |
| Width | 715 mm | 614 mm |
| Height | 628 mm | 592 mm |
| Depth | 273 mm | 274 mm |
