- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- PD3225U vs UltraFine 27UQ85RV
BenQ PD3225U vs LG UltraFine 27UQ85RV
What PD3225U does better (2) and where UltraFine 27UQ85RV wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Screen8.2
5.2Connectivity5.8
8.1Design & ergonomics5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD3225UUltraFine 27UQ85RV
| PD3225U | UltraFine 27UQ85RV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 628 mm | 599 mm | +29 mm |
| Width | 715 mm | 614 mm | +101 mm |
| Depth | 273 mm | 239 mm | +34 mm |
| Weight | 8.2 kg | 5.9 kg | +2.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD3225U better than UltraFine 27UQ85RV?
- Height adjustment150 mm vs 110 mm+36%
- Screen size31.5″ vs 27″+17%
Why is UltraFine 27UQ85RV better than PD3225U?
- Pixel density140 ppi vs 163 ppi+16%
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery)85 W vs 90 W+6%
- Weight8.2 kg vs 5.9 kg+39%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 31.5″ | 27″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 140 ppi | 163 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 400 nits | 400 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 2,000:1 | 2,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 98% | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 98% | 98% |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 | DisplayHDR 400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 85 W | 90 W |
| Thunderbolt | Yes | — |
| KVM switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 150 mm | 110 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | Yes |
| Swivel | Yes | — |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | — |
| Weight | 8.2 kg | 5.9 kg |
| Width | 715 mm | 614 mm |
| Height | 628 mm | 599 mm |
| Depth | 273 mm | 239 mm |
