- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- Pro Display XDR vs ProArt PA248QV
Apple Pro Display XDR vs Asus ProArt PA248QV
What Pro Display XDR does better (5) and where ProArt PA248QV wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Screen2.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pro Display XDRProArt PA248QV
| Pro Display XDR | ProArt PA248QV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 412 mm | 505 mm | −93 mm |
| Width | 718 mm | 533 mm | +185 mm |
| Depth | 27 mm | 211 mm | −184 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pro Display XDR better than ProArt PA248QV?
- Pixel density218 ppi vs 94 ppi2.3×
- Brightness (typical)500 nits vs 300 nits+67%
- Contrast ratio (static)1,000,000:1 vs 1,000:11,000×
- Colour depth10 bit vs 8 bit+25%
- Screen size32″ vs 24.1″+33%
Why is ProArt PA248QV better than Pro Display XDR?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 75 Hz+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 32″ | 24.1″ |
| Resolution | 6016 × 3384 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | 6K | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 218 ppi | 94 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 75 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 500 nits | 300 nits |
| Peak brightness (HDR) | 1,600 nits | — |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | — | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | — | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed) | — | ΔE 2 |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | 8 bit |
| HDR | — | HDR10 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | — |
| Thunderbolt | Yes | — |
| HDMI inputs | — | 1 |
| DisplayPort inputs | — | 1 |
| USB hub | — | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | — | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | — | 130 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | — | Yes |
| Swivel | — | Yes |
| VESA mount | — | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | — | 6.1 kg |
| Width | 718 mm | 533 mm |
| Height | 412 mm | 505 mm |
| Depth | 27 mm | 211 mm |
| Product line | Apple Pro Display | ASUS ProArt |
