How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. Pro Display XDR vs ProArt PA32UCG

Apple Pro Display XDR vs Asus ProArt PA32UCG

What Pro Display XDR does better (2) and where ProArt PA32UCG wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Apple Pro Display XDR
Apple · 2019Pro Display XDR
2 advantages
vs
Asus ProArt PA32UCG
Asus · 2021ProArt PA32UCG
7.6Score
2 advantages≈ $3,000
Higher score
9.7Screen7.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pro Display XDRProArt PA32UCG
718 × 41227727 × 600240
Pro Display XDRProArt PA32UCGDifference
Height412 mm600 mm−188 mm
Width718 mm727 mm−9 mm
Depth27 mm240 mm−213 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pro Display XDR better than ProArt PA32UCG?

  1. Pixel density218 ppi vs 138 ppi+58%
  2. Contrast ratio (static)1,000,000:1 vs 1,000:11,000×

Why is ProArt PA32UCG better than Pro Display XDR?

  1. Brightness (typical)500 nits vs 1,000 nits2×
  2. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
Specifications

Side by side

Asus ProArt PA32UCGAsus ProArt PA32UCG≈ $3,0007.6
Display
Screen size32″32″
Resolution6016 × 33843840 × 2160
Resolution class6K4K UHD
Pixel density218 ppi138 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz120 Hz
Brightness (typical)500 nits1,000 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)1,600 nits1,600 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000,000:11,000:1
Response time—5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screen—Yes
Colour
sRGB coverage—100%
Adobe RGB coverage—99.5%
DCI-P3 coverage—98%
Rec. 2020 coverage—85%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)—ΔE 1
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
Hardware calibration—Yes
HDR—HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)—60 W
ThunderboltYesYes
HDMI inputs—3
DisplayPort inputs—1
USB hub—Yes
Built-in speakers—Yes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—130 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)—Yes
Swivel—Yes
VESA mount—100 × 100 mm
Weight—14.64 kg
Width718 mm727 mm
Height412 mm600 mm
Depth27 mm240 mm
Product lineApple Pro Display—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare