- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- Pro Display XDR vs PD3220U
Apple Pro Display XDR vs BenQ PD3220U
What Pro Display XDR does better (3) and where PD3220U wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Screen5.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pro Display XDRPD3220U
| Pro Display XDR | PD3220U | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 412 mm | 628 mm | −216 mm |
| Width | 718 mm | 715 mm | +3 mm |
| Depth | 27 mm | 186 mm | −159 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pro Display XDR better than PD3220U?
- Pixel density218 ppi vs 140 ppi+56%
- Brightness (typical)500 nits vs 300 nits+67%
- Contrast ratio (static)1,000,000:1 vs 1,000:11,000×
Why is PD3220U better than Pro Display XDR?
PD3220U has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 32″ | 31.5″ |
| Resolution | 6016 × 3384 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | 6K | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 218 ppi | 140 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Brightness (typical) | 500 nits | 300 nits |
| Peak brightness (HDR) | 1,600 nits | — |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | — | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | — | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 95% |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | 10 bit |
| HDR | — | HDR10 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| Thunderbolt | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | — | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | — | 1 |
| USB hub | — | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | — | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | — | Yes |
| Weight | — | 10.4 kg |
| Width | 718 mm | 715 mm |
| Height | 412 mm | 628 mm |
| Depth | 27 mm | 186 mm |
| Product line | Apple Pro Display | — |
