- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- Pro Display XDR vs SW270C
Apple Pro Display XDR vs BenQ SW270C
What Pro Display XDR does better (4) and where SW270C wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Screen2.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pro Display XDRSW270C
| Pro Display XDR | SW270C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 412 mm | 626 mm | −214 mm |
| Width | 718 mm | 614 mm | +104 mm |
| Depth | 27 mm | 335 mm | −308 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pro Display XDR better than SW270C?
- Pixel density218 ppi vs 109 ppi2×
- Brightness (typical)500 nits vs 300 nits+67%
- Contrast ratio (static)1,000,000:1 vs 1,000:11,000×
- Screen size32″ vs 27″+19%
Why is SW270C better than Pro Display XDR?
SW270C has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 32″ | 27″ |
| Resolution | 6016 × 3384 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | 6K | QHD / 2.5K |
| Pixel density | 218 ppi | 109 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 500 nits | 300 nits |
| Peak brightness (HDR) | 1,600 nits | — |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | — | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | — | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Adobe RGB coverage | — | 99% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 97% |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | 10 bit |
| HDR | — | HDR10 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | — |
| Thunderbolt | Yes | — |
| HDMI inputs | — | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | — | 1 |
| USB hub | — | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | — | 150 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | — | No |
| Swivel | — | Yes |
| VESA mount | — | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | — | 9.8 kg |
| Width | 718 mm | 614 mm |
| Height | 412 mm | 626 mm |
| Depth | 27 mm | 335 mm |
| Product line | Apple Pro Display | BenQ PhotoVue |
