How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. Studio Display vs SW321C

Apple Studio Display vs BenQ SW321C

What Studio Display does better (3) and where SW321C wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Apple Studio Display
Apple · 2022Studio Display
8.2Score
3 advantages≈ $1,600
Higher score
vs
BenQ SW321C
BenQ · 2020SW321C
6.0Score
3 advantages≈ $1,550
9.5Screen4.2
5.4Connectivity7.8
4.5Design & ergonomics5.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Studio DisplaySW321C
623 × 36231747 × 652224
Studio DisplaySW321CDifference
Height362 mm652 mm−290 mm
Width623 mm747 mm−124 mm
Depth31 mm224 mm−193 mm
Weight6.3 kg11.8 kg−5.5 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Studio Display better than SW321C?

  1. Brightness (typical)600 nits vs 250 nits2.4×
  2. Pixel density218 ppi vs 138 ppi+58%
  3. Weight6.3 kg vs 11.8 kg+87%

Why is SW321C better than Studio Display?

  1. Height adjustment105 mm vs 150 mm+43%
  2. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 76 Hz+27%
  3. Screen size27″ vs 32″+19%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ SW321CBenQ SW321C≈ $1,5506.0
Display
Screen size27″32″
Resolution5120 × 28803840 × 2160
Resolution class5K4K UHD
Pixel density218 ppi138 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz76 Hz
Brightness (typical)600 nits250 nits
Contrast ratio (static)—1,000:1
Response time—5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage—100%
Adobe RGB coverage—99%
DCI-P3 coverage—95%
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
HDR—HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
ThunderboltYes—
HDMI inputs—2
DisplayPort inputs—1
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYes—
Built-in webcamYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment105 mm150 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)—Yes
Swivel—Yes
VESA mount—100 × 100 mm
Weight6.3 kg11.8 kg
Width623 mm747 mm
Height362 mm652 mm
Depth31 mm224 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare