How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. Studio Display vs UltraSharp U4025QW

Apple Studio Display vs Dell UltraSharp U4025QW

What Studio Display does better (3) and where UltraSharp U4025QW wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Apple Studio Display
Apple · 2022Studio Display
9.3Score
3 advantages≈ $1,750
Higher score
vs
Dell UltraSharp U4025QW
Dell · 2024UltraSharp U4025QW
8.8Score
2 advantages≈ $1,700
9.6Screen8.7
5.3Connectivity7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Studio DisplayUltraSharp U4025QW
623 × 36231947 × 622253
Studio DisplayUltraSharp U4025QWDifference
Height362 mm622 mm−260 mm
Width623 mm947 mm−324 mm
Depth31 mm253 mm−222 mm
Weight6.3 kg12.2 kg−5.9 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Studio Display better than UltraSharp U4025QW?

  1. Pixel density218 ppi vs 139 ppi+57%
  2. Brightness (typical)600 nits vs 450 nits+33%
  3. Weight6.3 kg vs 12.22 kg+94%

Why is UltraSharp U4025QW better than Studio Display?

  1. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
  2. Screen size27″ vs 40″+48%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size27″40″
Resolution5120 × 28805120 × 2160
Resolution class5K5K
Pixel density218 ppi139 ppi
Aspect ratio16:921:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz120 Hz
Brightness (typical)600 nits450 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)—600 nits
Contrast ratio (static)—2,000:1
Response time—5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Curved screen—Yes
Colour
sRGB coverage—100%
DCI-P3 coverage—99%
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
HDR—DisplayHDR 600
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)—140 W
ThunderboltYesYes
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs—1
DisplayPort inputs—1
USB hubYesYes
Ethernet (RJ45)—Yes
Daisy chain (DP MST)—Yes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Built-in webcamYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—150 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)—No
Swivel—Yes
VESA mount—100 × 100 mm
Weight6.3 kg12.22 kg
Width623 mm947 mm
Height362 mm622 mm
Depth31 mm253 mm
Product line—Dell UltraSharp
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare