- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- Studio Display vs UltraFine 32U990A
Apple Studio Display vs LG UltraFine 32U990A
What Studio Display does better (2) and where UltraFine 32U990A wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Screen9.6
5.3Connectivity7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Studio DisplayUltraFine 32U990A
| Studio Display | UltraFine 32U990A | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 362 mm | 582 mm | −220 mm |
| Width | 623 mm | 718 mm | −95 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 198 mm | −167 mm |
| Weight | 6.3 kg | 9.5 kg | −3.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Studio Display better than UltraFine 32U990A?
- Brightness (typical)600 nits vs 450 nits+33%
- Weight6.3 kg vs 9.5 kg+51%
Why is UltraFine 32U990A better than Studio Display?
- Pixel density218 ppi vs 224 ppi+3%
- Screen size27″ vs 31.5″+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 27″ | 31.5″ |
| Resolution | 5120 × 2880 | 6144 × 3456 |
| Resolution class | 5K | 6K |
| Pixel density | 218 ppi | 224 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 600 nits | 450 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | — | 2,000:1 |
| Response time | — | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| Adobe RGB coverage | — | 99.5% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 98% |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | — |
| HDR | — | DisplayHDR 600 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | 96 W |
| Thunderbolt | Yes | Yes |
| KVM switch | — | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | — | 1 |
| DisplayPort inputs | — | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in webcam | Yes | — |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | — | 60 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | — | Yes |
| Weight | 6.3 kg | 9.5 kg |
| Width | 623 mm | 718 mm |
| Height | 362 mm | 582 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 198 mm |
