How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA278CGV vs UltraFine 32UN550

Asus ProArt PA278CGV vs LG UltraFine 32UN550

What ProArt PA278CGV does better (4) and where UltraFine 32UN550 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA278CGV
Asus · 2023ProArt PA278CGV
6.0Score
4 advantages≈ $340
Higher score
vs
LG UltraFine 32UN550
4.6Score
4 advantages≈ $350
4.3Screen7.2
7.6Design & ergonomics2.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

ProArt PA278CGVUltraFine 32UN550
615 × 524228714 × 596227
ProArt PA278CGVUltraFine 32UN550Difference
Height524 mm596 mm−72 mm
Width615 mm714 mm−99 mm
Depth228 mm227 mm+1 mm
Weight8.5 kg8.4 kg+0.1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ProArt PA278CGV better than UltraFine 32UN550?

  1. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 61 Hz2.4×
  2. Panel typeIPS vs VA
  3. DCI-P3 coverage95% vs 90%+6%
  4. Height adjustment150 mm vs 110 mm+36%

Why is UltraFine 32UN550 better than ProArt PA278CGV?

  1. Pixel density109 ppi vs 140 ppi+28%
  2. Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1 vs 3,000:13×
  3. Response time5 ms vs 4 ms+25%
  4. Screen size27″ vs 31.5″+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size27″31.5″
Resolution2560 × 14403840 × 2160
Resolution classQHD / 2.5K4K UHD
Pixel density109 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSVA
Refresh rate144 Hz61 Hz
Brightness (typical)350 nits350 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)400 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:13,000:1
Response time5 ms4 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%—
DCI-P3 coverage95%90%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 2—
Colour depth10 bit—
HDR—HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)Yes—
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W—
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYes—
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment150 mm110 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes—
SwivelYes—
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight8.5 kg8.4 kg
Width615 mm714 mm
Height524 mm596 mm
Depth228 mm227 mm
Product lineASUS ProArt—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare