How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA278QGV vs UltraFine 32U720B

Asus ProArt PA278QGV vs LG UltraFine 32U720B

What ProArt PA278QGV does better (4) and where UltraFine 32U720B wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA278QGV
Asus · 2026ProArt PA278QGV
5.8Score
4 advantages≈ $270
Higher score
vs
LG UltraFine 32U720B
4.4Score
3 advantages≈ $360
5.0Screen4.1
5.8Design & ergonomics5.1

Why is ProArt PA278QGV better than UltraFine 32U720B?

  1. Brightness (typical)350 nits vs 250 nits+40%
  2. Panel typeIPS vs VA
  3. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
  4. Height adjustment130 mm vs 80 mm+62%

Why is UltraFine 32U720B better than ProArt PA278QGV?

  1. Pixel density109 ppi vs 140 ppi+28%
  2. Contrast ratio (static)1,500:1 vs 3,000:12×
  3. Screen size27″ vs 31.5″+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size27″31.5″
Resolution2560 × 14403840 × 2160
Resolution classQHD / 2.5K4K UHD
Pixel density109 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSVA
Refresh rate120 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)350 nits250 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,500:13,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%99%
DCI-P3 coverage95%—
Colour depth10 bit—
HDRHDR10HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)—Yes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)—65 W
HDMI inputs11
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment130 mm80 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes—
SwivelYes—
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight—5.8 kg
Width—714 mm
Height—524 mm
Depth—256 mm
Product lineASUS ProArt—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare