How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA278QV vs UltraFine 32U720B

Asus ProArt PA278QV vs LG UltraFine 32U720B

What ProArt PA278QV does better (4) and where UltraFine 32U720B wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA278QV
Asus · 2026ProArt PA278QV
4.8Score
4 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
LG UltraFine 32U720B
4.4Score
4 advantages≈ $360
3.6Screen4.1
8.3Design & ergonomics5.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

ProArt PA278QVUltraFine 32U720B
615 × 532226714 × 524256
ProArt PA278QVUltraFine 32U720BDifference
Height532 mm524 mm+8 mm
Width615 mm714 mm−99 mm
Depth226 mm256 mm−30 mm
Weight7.6 kg5.8 kg+1.8 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ProArt PA278QV better than UltraFine 32U720B?

  1. Brightness (typical)350 nits vs 250 nits+40%
  2. Panel typeIPS vs VA
  3. Height adjustment150 mm vs 80 mm+88%
  4. Refresh rate75 Hz vs 60 Hz+25%

Why is UltraFine 32U720B better than ProArt PA278QV?

  1. Pixel density109 ppi vs 140 ppi+28%
  2. Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1 vs 3,000:13×
  3. Weight7.56 kg vs 5.8 kg+30%
  4. Screen size27″ vs 31.5″+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size27″31.5″
Resolution2560 × 14403840 × 2160
Resolution classQHD / 2.5K4K UHD
Pixel density109 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSVA
Refresh rate75 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)350 nits250 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:13,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%99%
DCI-P3 coverage95%—
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 2—
Colour depth8 bit—
HDRHDR10HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)—Yes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)—65 W
HDMI inputs11
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment150 mm80 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes—
SwivelYes—
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight7.56 kg5.8 kg
Width615 mm714 mm
Height532 mm524 mm
Depth226 mm256 mm
Product lineASUS ProArt—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare