How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA278QV vs UltraFine 27US50Z

Asus ProArt PA278QV vs LG UltraFine 27US50Z

What ProArt PA278QV does better (5) and where UltraFine 27US50Z wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA278QV
Asus · 2026ProArt PA278QV
4.8Score
5 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
LG UltraFine 27US50Z
4.2Score
4 advantages≈ $230
3.6Screen5.4
2.8Colour accuracy3.3
8.3Design & ergonomics3.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

ProArt PA278QVUltraFine 27US50Z
615 × 532226614 × 455215
ProArt PA278QVUltraFine 27US50ZDifference
Height532 mm455 mm+77 mm
Width615 mm614 mm+1 mm
Depth226 mm215 mm+11 mm
Weight7.6 kg5.5 kg+2.1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ProArt PA278QV better than UltraFine 27US50Z?

  1. Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes · UltraFine 27US50Z: No
  2. SwivelYes · UltraFine 27US50Z: No
  3. Brightness (typical)350 nits vs 300 nits+17%
  4. DCI-P3 coverage95% vs 90%+6%
  5. Refresh rate75 Hz vs 60 Hz+25%

Why is UltraFine 27US50Z better than ProArt PA278QV?

  1. Pixel density109 ppi vs 163 ppi+50%
  2. Colour depth8 bit vs 10 bit+25%
  3. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
  4. Weight7.56 kg vs 5.5 kg+37%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size27″27″
Resolution2560 × 14403840 × 2160
Resolution classQHD / 2.5K4K UHD
Pixel density109 ppi163 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate75 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)350 nits300 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%—
DCI-P3 coverage95%90%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 2—
Colour depth8 bit10 bit
HDRHDR10HDR10
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYes—
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment150 mm—
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesNo
SwivelYesNo
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight7.56 kg5.5 kg
Width615 mm614 mm
Height532 mm455 mm
Depth226 mm215 mm
Product lineASUS ProArtLG UltraFine
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare