How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA278QV vs PD2706QN

Asus ProArt PA278QV vs BenQ PD2706QN

What ProArt PA278QV does better (2) and where PD2706QN wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA278QV
Asus · 2026ProArt PA278QV
4.9Score
2 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
BenQ PD2706QN
BenQ · 2025PD2706QN
4.2Score
1 advantage≈ $420
3.8Screen4.0
2.8Colour accuracy2.9
8.4Design & ergonomics4.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

ProArt PA278QVPD2706QN
615 × 532226614 × 545220
ProArt PA278QVPD2706QNDifference
Height532 mm545 mm−13 mm
Width615 mm614 mm+1 mm
Depth226 mm220 mm+6 mm
Weight7.6 kg9.3 kg−1.8 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ProArt PA278QV better than PD2706QN?

  1. Height adjustment150 mm vs 115 mm+30%
  2. Weight7.56 kg vs 9.32 kg+23%

Why is PD2706QN better than ProArt PA278QV?

  1. Refresh rate75 Hz vs 100 Hz+33%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ PD2706QNBenQ PD2706QN≈ $4204.2
Display
Screen size27″27″
Resolution2560 × 14402560 × 1440
Resolution classQHD / 2.5KQHD / 2.5K
Pixel density109 ppi109 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate75 Hz100 Hz
Brightness (typical)350 nits350 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%100%
DCI-P3 coverage95%95%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 2—
Colour depth8 bit8 bit
HDRHDR10HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)—Yes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)—90 W
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs11
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Daisy chain (DP MST)—Yes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment150 mm115 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight7.56 kg9.32 kg
Width615 mm614 mm
Height532 mm545 mm
Depth226 mm220 mm
Product lineASUS ProArtBenQ PD
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare