How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA279CRV vs PD2705UA

Asus ProArt PA279CRV vs BenQ PD2705UA

What ProArt PA279CRV does better (4) and where PD2705UA wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA279CRV
Asus · 2023ProArt PA279CRV
8.6Score
4 advantages≈ $490
Higher score
vs
BenQ PD2705UA
BenQ · 2023PD2705UA
4.6Score
1 advantage≈ $570
6.5Screen5.1
9.5Connectivity3.0
8.3Design & ergonomics4.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

ProArt PA279CRVPD2705UA
612.2 × 538.1215614 × 703459
ProArt PA279CRVPD2705UADifference
Height538.1 mm703 mm−164.9 mm
Width612.2 mm614 mm−1.8 mm
Depth215 mm459 mm−244 mm
Weight5.8 kg10 kg−4.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ProArt PA279CRV better than PD2705UA?

  1. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W vs 65 W+48%
  2. Brightness (typical)350 nits vs 250 nits+40%
  3. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  4. Weight5.78 kg vs 10 kg+73%

Why is PD2705UA better than ProArt PA279CRV?

  1. Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1 vs 1,200:1+20%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ PD2705UABenQ PD2705UA≈ $5704.6
Display
Screen size27″27″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density163 ppi163 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)350 nits250 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)400 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,200:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%99%
Adobe RGB coverage99%—
DCI-P3 coverage99%—
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 2—
Colour depth10 bit—
HDRHDR10HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W65 W
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs21
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment130 mm—
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYes—
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight5.78 kg10 kg
Width612 mm614 mm
Height538 mm703 mm
Depth215 mm459 mm
Product lineASUS ProArt—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare