How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA279CRV vs SW272Q

Asus ProArt PA279CRV vs BenQ SW272Q

What ProArt PA279CRV does better (4) and where SW272Q wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA279CRV
Asus · 2023ProArt PA279CRV
8.6Score
4 advantages≈ $490
Higher score
vs
BenQ SW272Q
BenQ · 2023SW272Q
5.9Score
1 advantage≈ $670
6.5Screen2.8
6.0Colour accuracy5.5
9.5Connectivity6.2
8.3Design & ergonomics6.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

ProArt PA279CRVSW272Q
612.2 × 538.1215614 × 592274
ProArt PA279CRVSW272QDifference
Height538.1 mm592 mm−53.9 mm
Width612.2 mm614 mm−1.8 mm
Depth215 mm274 mm−59 mm
Weight5.8 kg8.3 kg−2.5 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ProArt PA279CRV better than SW272Q?

  1. Pixel density163 ppi vs 109 ppi+50%
  2. Brightness (typical)350 nits vs 300 nits+17%
  3. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W vs 90 W+7%
  4. Weight5.78 kg vs 8.3 kg+44%

Why is SW272Q better than ProArt PA279CRV?

  1. Height adjustment130 mm vs 140 mm+8%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ SW272QBenQ SW272Q≈ $6705.9
Display
Screen size27″27″
Resolution3840 × 21602560 × 1440
Resolution class4K UHDQHD / 2.5K
Pixel density163 ppi109 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)350 nits300 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)400 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%100%
Adobe RGB coverage99%99%
DCI-P3 coverage99%98%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 2—
Colour depth10 bit—
HDRHDR10HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W90 W
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment130 mm140 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight5.78 kg8.3 kg
Width612 mm614 mm
Height538 mm592 mm
Depth215 mm274 mm
Product lineASUS ProArt—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare