How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA279CV vs ThinkVision P32p-20

Asus ProArt PA279CV vs Lenovo ThinkVision P32p-20

What ProArt PA279CV does better (4) and where ThinkVision P32p-20 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA279CV
Asus · 2021ProArt PA279CV
6.6Score
4 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Lenovo ThinkVision P32p-20
Lenovo · 2020ThinkVision P32p-20
5.2Score
1 advantage
6.5Screen4.7
4.9Colour accuracy3.1
3.7Connectivity3.9
7.3Design & ergonomics7.4

Why is ProArt PA279CV better than ThinkVision P32p-20?

  1. Pixel density163 ppi vs 140 ppi+16%
  2. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  3. Response time5 ms vs 6 ms+20%
  4. Height adjustment150 mm vs 135 mm+11%

Why is ThinkVision P32p-20 better than ProArt PA279CV?

  1. Screen size27″ vs 31.5″+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size27″31.5″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density163 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)350 nits350 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms6 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%99%
DCI-P3 coverage—90%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 2—
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
HDRHDR10—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)Yes—
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)65 W—
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs21
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Ethernet (RJ45)—Yes
Built-in speakersYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment150 mm135 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight8.6 kg—
Width614 mm—
Height524 mm—
Depth228 mm—
Product lineASUS ProArtLenovo ThinkVision
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare