How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA328CGV vs PD3220U

Asus ProArt PA328CGV vs BenQ PD3220U

What ProArt PA328CGV does better (1) and where PD3220U wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA328CGV
Asus · 2021ProArt PA328CGV
5.6Score
1 advantage≈ $650
Higher score
vs
BenQ PD3220U
BenQ · 2019PD3220U
5.3Score
2 advantages≈ $990
5.6Screen4.8
4.0Colour accuracy4.4
6.8Connectivity7.5
4.2Design & ergonomics3.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

ProArt PA328CGVPD3220U
727.1 × 601.5245715 × 628186
ProArt PA328CGVPD3220UDifference
Height601.5 mm628 mm−26.5 mm
Width727.1 mm715 mm+12.1 mm
Depth245 mm186 mm+59 mm
Weight11.7 kg10.4 kg+1.3 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ProArt PA328CGV better than PD3220U?

  1. Brightness (typical)450 nits vs 300 nits+50%

Why is PD3220U better than ProArt PA328CGV?

  1. Pixel density92 ppi vs 140 ppi+52%
  2. Weight11.7 kg vs 10.4 kg+12%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ PD3220UBenQ PD3220U≈ $9905.3
Display
Screen size32″31.5″
Resolution2560 × 14403840 × 2160
Resolution classQHD / 2.5K4K UHD
Pixel density92 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate165 Hz—
Brightness (typical)450 nits300 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)600 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%100%
DCI-P3 coverage95%95%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 2—
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
HDRHDR10HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W—
Thunderbolt—Yes
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs—1
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment130 mm—
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYes—
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight11.7 kg10.4 kg
Width727 mm715 mm
Height602 mm628 mm
Depth245 mm186 mm
Product lineASUS ProArt—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare