How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA328CGV vs UltraSharp U4320Q

Asus ProArt PA328CGV vs Dell UltraSharp U4320Q

What ProArt PA328CGV does better (5) and where UltraSharp U4320Q wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA328CGV
Asus · 2021ProArt PA328CGV
5.6Score
5 advantages≈ $650
Higher score
vs
Dell UltraSharp U4320Q
Dell · 2020UltraSharp U4320Q
3.7Score
2 advantages
5.6Screen3.2
4.2Design & ergonomics3.4

Why is ProArt PA328CGV better than UltraSharp U4320Q?

  1. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 60 Hz2.8×
  2. Brightness (typical)450 nits vs 350 nits+29%
  3. Height adjustment130 mm vs 60 mm2.2×
  4. Response time5 ms vs 8 ms+60%
  5. sRGB coverage100% vs 96%+4%

Why is UltraSharp U4320Q better than ProArt PA328CGV?

  1. Pixel density92 ppi vs 103 ppi+12%
  2. Screen size32″ vs 42.5″+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size32″42.5″
Resolution2560 × 14403840 × 2160
Resolution classQHD / 2.5K4K UHD
Pixel density92 ppi103 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate165 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)450 nits350 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)600 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms8 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%96%
DCI-P3 coverage95%—
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 2—
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
HDRHDR10—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)Yes—
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W—
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs—1
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment130 mm60 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight11.7 kg—
Width727 mm—
Height602 mm—
Depth245 mm—
Product lineASUS ProArtDell UltraSharp
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare