How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA32DC vs UltraSharp UP2720QA

Asus ProArt PA32DC vs Dell UltraSharp UP2720QA

What ProArt PA32DC does better (5) and where UltraSharp UP2720QA wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA32DC
Asus · 2022ProArt PA32DC
7.8Score
5 advantages≈ $3,400
vs
Dell UltraSharp UP2720QA
7.9Score
1 advantage≈ $1,750
Higher score
7.0Screen4.8
6.9Colour accuracy8.9
5.2Connectivity7.6
6.4Design & ergonomics6.0

Why is ProArt PA32DC better than UltraSharp UP2720QA?

  1. Contrast ratio (static)1,000,000:1 vs 1,300:1769.2×
  2. Response time0.1 ms vs 6 ms60×
  3. Panel typeOLED vs IPS
  4. HDMI inputs3 vs 2+50%
  5. Screen size31.5″ vs 27″+17%

Why is UltraSharp UP2720QA better than ProArt PA32DC?

  1. Pixel density140 ppi vs 163 ppi+16%
Specifications

Side by side

Asus ProArt PA32DCAsus ProArt PA32DC≈ $3,4007.8
Display
Screen size31.5″27″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density140 ppi163 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeOLEDIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)250 nits250 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)500 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,000,000:11,300:1
Response time0.1 ms6 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
Adobe RGB coverage99%100%
DCI-P3 coverage99%98%
Rec. 2020 coverage—80%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 1—
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
Hardware calibrationYes—
HDRHDR10—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)65 W—
Thunderbolt—Yes
HDMI inputs32
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment130 mm130 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight7.6 kg—
Width735 mm—
Height627 mm—
Depth245 mm—
Product lineASUS ProArtDell UltraSharp
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare