How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA32UCX vs UltraSharp U4320Q

Asus ProArt PA32UCX vs Dell UltraSharp U4320Q

What ProArt PA32UCX does better (7) and where UltraSharp U4320Q wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA32UCX
Asus · 2020ProArt PA32UCX
7.8Score
7 advantages≈ $2,350
Higher score
vs
Dell UltraSharp U4320Q
Dell · 2020UltraSharp U4320Q
3.8Score
1 advantage
8.0Screen3.4
3.8Design & ergonomics3.5

Why is ProArt PA32UCX better than UltraSharp U4320Q?

  1. Pixel density138 ppi vs 103 ppi+34%
  2. Brightness (typical)600 nits vs 350 nits+71%
  3. Contrast ratio (static)20,000:1 vs 1,000:120×
  4. Height adjustment130 mm vs 60 mm2.2×
  5. Response time5 ms vs 8 ms+60%
  6. HDMI inputs3 vs 2+50%
  7. sRGB coverage100% vs 96%+4%

Why is UltraSharp U4320Q better than ProArt PA32UCX?

  1. Screen size32″ vs 42.5″+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Asus ProArt PA32UCXAsus ProArt PA32UCX≈ $2,3507.8
Display
Screen size32″42.5″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density138 ppi103 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)600 nits350 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)1,200 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)20,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms8 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%96%
Adobe RGB coverage99.5%—
DCI-P3 coverage99%—
Rec. 2020 coverage89%—
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 1—
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
Hardware calibrationYes—
HDRHDR10—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)Yes—
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)60 W—
HDMI inputs32
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment130 mm60 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight14 kg—
Width727 mm—
Height600 mm—
Depth240 mm—
Product lineASUS ProArtDell UltraSharp
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare