How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. MA270U vs UltraFine 32UQ850

BenQ MA270U vs LG UltraFine 32UQ850

What MA270U does better (3) and where UltraFine 32UQ850 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

BenQ MA270U
BenQ · 2024MA270U
7.1Score
3 advantages≈ $510
vs
LG UltraFine 32UQ850
7.2Score
4 advantages≈ $540
Higher score
8.3Screen7.5
6.8Connectivity5.8
5.0Design & ergonomics4.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

MA270UUltraFine 32UQ850
614 × 560220715 × 598239
MA270UUltraFine 32UQ850Difference
Height560 mm598 mm−38 mm
Width614 mm715 mm−101 mm
Depth220 mm239 mm−19 mm
Weight8.2 kg7.2 kg+1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MA270U better than UltraFine 32UQ850?

  1. Pixel density163 ppi vs 140 ppi+16%
  2. Refresh rate76 Hz vs 60 Hz+27%
  3. Height adjustment115 mm vs 110 mm+5%

Why is UltraFine 32UQ850 better than MA270U?

  1. Contrast ratio (static)1,200:1 vs 2,000:1+67%
  2. DCI-P3 coverage95% vs 98%+3%
  3. Screen size27″ vs 31.5″+17%
  4. Weight8.2 kg vs 7.2 kg+14%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ MA270UBenQ MA270U≈ $5107.1
Display
Screen size27″31.5″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density163 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate76 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)400 nits400 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,200:12,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage99%—
DCI-P3 coverage95%98%
Colour depth10 bit—
HDRDisplayHDR 400DisplayHDR 400
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W90 W
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs—1
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment115 mm110 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYes—
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight8.2 kg7.2 kg
Width614 mm715 mm
Height560 mm598 mm
Depth220 mm239 mm
Product lineBenQ MALG UltraFine
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare